With the new year upon us it seems only appropriate to begin writing again. Of course, we have impeachment, the race in the Democratic Party for President and now the possibility of a new war in the Middle East. Welcome to 2020 in the era of Trumpian dystopia.
First on impeachment. When the Federal government was chasing Al Capone, they could never convict him on murder, drugs, prostitution overlord, or any of these obvious, yet hard to prove, charges in courts controlled by the mob. So, what happened was they got him on income tax evasion. It was hardly his most serious offense, but it did get him out of circulation and allowed an effort to clean things up.
In the same way, the various offenses committed by our President have been difficult to prove in a way that could be seen as crimes instead of the flouting of conventional standards of decent behavior. So, the actions involving Ukraine were seized upon and used as the basis to move forward. It is barely disputable that this wasn’t a quid pro quo, nor is it deniable that a serious threat from the Russians faced Ukraine and the withholding of aid already approved by the Congress made their position even more tenuous. What is obvious is that no other President in recent memory would have been impeached for this action. It is further obvious that no other President would have done this. So, the House took what he gave them and did their duty. As to what is an impeachable offense, I would refer people back to then House Minority Leader, Gerald Ford, who during an investigation of Supreme Court Justice Abe Fortas, “an impeachable offense is anything the House of Representatives determines it is.”
Now on to the Democrats. With the early money reposts it appears that Sanders and Warren are in for the long haul. That is good news to the non-left wing of the party. If neither can consolidate their wing, they will allow someone more moderate to have a chance to do just that. Biden continues to have the most to gain and lose in Iowa. If he does well, he can survive New Hampshire and Nevada, win in South Carolina and be the leader going into Super Tuesday when 14 states vote. But if he falters and finishes behind Bernie, Warren, Pete, and maybe Klobuchar and even Steyer, he will find the following weeks very difficult and almost impossible to raise the money he willed in order to compete.
Pete needs a very good showing in Iowa to have the momentum he will need for New Hampshire and beyond. Should he falter, he will not have a logical place where he can win a state to create the needed momentum necessary to sustain his impressive fund raising to date. Klobuchar is all in in Iowa. If she doesn’t do well there, her campaign is over, as is that of Cory Booker. I expect Andrew Yang will hang around for a while as the “Yang Gang” will continue to send money to support his unconventional candidacy. Steyer can continue as longs he wants as his personal wealth will allow him to do so and he has shown some movement in all of the four early states.
Best guess as of today is that Bernie squeaks out a win in Iowa over Pete and Warren with Biden a distant fourth in a cluster with Klobachar, Steyer and Yang. But wait until tomorrow because things may be different.
I’m pleased to see a post in this blog. I’ve missed Allan’s comments and thoughts and hope to see more of them in 2020.
LikeLike
“What is obvious is that no other President in recent memory would have been impeached for this action. …..So, the House took what he gave them and did their duty.”
I’m not a lawyer, but isn’t the law supposed to be applied equally to everyone….no exceptions? What I think Allan said here is that neither Obama, nor Bush, nor Clinton would have been impeached for a Ukraine kind of activity, but people hate Trump so much that the Dems in the House impeached Trump for something they would never have impeached anybody else.
I personally despise Trump, and the circus that he brings to the Presidency. But we are going down a very slippery slope when we have prosecutors who decide to prosecute A because they don’t like him, and give B a pass on the exact same offense because they do like him. Should the Republicans have impeached Obama when he lied to the American people…” If you like your health insurance, you can keep your health insurance” or when Obama lied about the red line in Syria that would be crossed if Assad used poison gas on his people? Lots of other examples with Obama. Of course not, but I bet they will do that to a Democratic President the next chance they get.
My point here is that the House Dems have really lowered the bar for Impeachment…..and to what end. There is no chance of a conviction in the Senate. So, the next time we have a Democratic President, and a Republican House, is it OK for the House to impeach the President on any little infringement, ala the Gerald Ford quote about impeachment, cited above by Alan?
If revenge is indeed a dish best served cold, then this farce of an impeachment will haunt politics for the next 50 years.
LikeLike
Leo Nice to hear from you. You take part of my point. However, it is not just that Democrats hate Trump. What I am saying is that his behavior is so consistently egregious and his actions so close to the line on a daily basis, that this action was enough. Remember that Pelosi fought against this for a long time. As to his chances of conviction in the Senate, I think that that is not the constitutional basis for going forward. While many Dems wanted him gone from the beginning, many who voted to impeach knew they may be ending their political career with the vote. You don’t have to agree with them but they do deserve some points for political courage which is in very short supply everywhere. Best to Judy
Sent from my iPad
>
LikeLike